Follow-up from "Revert "Start to port to qt5keychain""
The following discussion from !29 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@lbeltrame started a discussion: (+1 comment) I see. This makes a bit more compelling the case for a revert. @mlaurent ?
The following discussion from !29 (merged) should be addressed:
I see. This makes a bit more compelling the case for a revert. @mlaurent ?