-
ivan tkachenko authored
Regarding [].includes(), I stand by the point that QML engine should be perfectly capable of optimizing such expressions in JIT down to a pair of (>= && <=) checks -- given that enum members are continuous.
Regarding [].includes(), I stand by the point that QML engine should be perfectly capable of optimizing such expressions in JIT down to a pair of (>= && <=) checks -- given that enum members are continuous.