-
Michael Pyne authored
Coverity complains about an index being unset (CID 1356740). While I'm pretty sure this is a false positive given the code path in question there's no performance reason not to set the index here. While I was at it, I also fixed a GCC warning about a separate "potentially uninitialized" variable. Again seems to be a false positive (unless an extract operation starts somehow already marked to abort) but fixing anyways. I chose ARCHIVE_RETRY to hint to *not* abort the operation if this does somehow make it into error path.
5d10d446